Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (105W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.9GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170 +19%
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Dec 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1008 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
112.9GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.50 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.15 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
414.7 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

105W
TDP
182W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy