Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1072MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 X2 +396%
2.47 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Nov 2013
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1072 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
1152
16
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.73 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.470 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
102.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-225-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

105W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy