Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 480 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 480 +170%
1.345 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Mar 2010
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
15
320
Shading Units
480
16
TMUs
60
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.03 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.06 GTexel/s
-
-
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1345 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
168.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-375-A3
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy