Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock1239MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 GM206 +155%
1.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Nov 2015
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1087 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1239 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.65 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.65 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1269 GFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.65 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

105W
TDP
60W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy