Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD FireStream 9170 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +1548%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
FireStream
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
802 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
175W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy