Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

AMD FireStream 9170 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 105W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +2620%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
802 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
51.33GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
320
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
12.43 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
497.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
99.46 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

105W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

RV670
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.666 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
192 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy