Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX +318%
5.027 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Feb 2021
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
800
Shading Units
1408
40
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
TU116
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy