Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1392MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti +78%
2.138 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Oct 2016
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1392 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.54 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.82 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.41 GFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.138 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GP107
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
GP107-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy