Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +493%
7.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1545 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
800
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.127 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.127 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
111.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
90W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
GA107
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
GA107-140-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy