Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
720 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6250 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (19W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270 +1053%
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6250
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2011
FireStream
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
80
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

160W
TDP
19W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Cedar
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy