Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 8200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 230W)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 8200 +795%
10.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2018
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
56
-
-
-
800
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
336.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
21.50 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.75 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
230W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Vega 10
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy