Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
3296 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +582%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2015
FireStream
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
64
800
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Fiji
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Board Design

160W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy