Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

AMD FireStream 9270 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +1026%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
800
Shading Units
2560
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
AD107
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy