Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD FirePro W4300

AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350 +41%
2.016 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Dec 2015
FireStream
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
18
Compute Units
12
1440
Shading Units
768
72
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Bonaire
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
TeraScale 2
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy