Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD FireStream 9250

AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350 +101%
2.016 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Jun 2008
FireStream
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
800
72
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
RV770
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy