AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
1056 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 170W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.3GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
+54%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
1.306 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Jan 2011
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.3GB/s
Render Config
18
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
8
1440
Shading Units
384
72
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
13.60 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
54.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
108.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
170W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
3x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
GF114
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
GF114-400-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
