Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
96 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 170W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1046MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.2GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760 OEM +39%
2.812 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Nov 2016
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
993 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1046 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1650 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
211.2GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
1344
72
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.29 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
117.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.812 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
117.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
170W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GK104
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy