Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

AMD FireStream 9350 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1320 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350 +1100%
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Feb 2008
FireStream
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
120
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
45W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
RV630
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy