Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 6290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1360 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6290 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (19W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350 +1838%
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6290
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Dec 2011
FireStream
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
18
Compute Units
2
1440
Shading Units
80
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Cedar
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cedar LE
TeraScale 2
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
19W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy