Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM

AMD FireStream 9350 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1424 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350 +5660%
2.016 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 OEM
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Sep 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
18
Compute Units
-
1440
Shading Units
16
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GT216
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy