Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD FireStream 9350

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
3680 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6900X +992%
22.02 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Jun 2010
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1825 MHz
Base Clock
-
2150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

80
Compute Units
18
-
-
-
5120
Shading Units
1440
320
TMUs
72
128
ROPs
32
-
-
-
80
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

275.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
688.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
44.03 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.02 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
1376 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
150W
700 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
Cypress
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy