Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

AMD FireStream 9350 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
2400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9350
2.016 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800 +783%
17.82 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Jun 2021
FireStream
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2075 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2320 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

18
Compute Units
60
-
-
-
1440
Shading Units
3840
72
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
222.7 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
556.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
35.64 TFLOPS
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.82 TFLOPS
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1114 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
Navi 21
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy