Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9350 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

AMD FireStream 9350 vs ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 12.48GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon X1600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 150W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Oct 2007
FireStream
Generation
Radeon R500 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
390 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.48GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
18
Compute Units
-
1440
Shading Units
-
72
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

22.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
50.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.016 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
403.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
RV530
Cypress PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV530 PRO (215CADAKA24FG)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
90 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.157 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
150 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
41W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
Floppy

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.4
OpenGL
2.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy