AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
+582%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2010
Release Date
Mar 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1600
Shading Units
128
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Cypress
GPU Name
G92B
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.0
Shader Model
4.0
