Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370 +392%
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Nov 2008
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
27
1600
Shading Units
216
80
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
171W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
GT200B
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.4
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
5.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy