Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

AMD FireStream 9370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 +412%
13.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2505 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2640 MHz
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
216.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
1600
Shading Units
2560
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
18
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.48 GPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
AD107
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy