Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9370 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

AMD FireStream 9370 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 and 32MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 32 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 32 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 225W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2010
Release Date
Unknown
FireStream
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1150 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
147.2GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1600
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
2
32
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
66.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
-
-
-
2.640 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
528.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
15W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Cypress
GPU Name
VSA-101
Cypress XT GL
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
180 nm
2.154 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
334 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
6.0
4.4
OpenGL
1.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy