Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs Intel Arc A350

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs Intel Arc A350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 31W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Arc A350 +7776%
3.072 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
DG2-128
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy