Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +20905%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Aug 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Fiji
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy