Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI FirePro V3900

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 50W)
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900 +1500%
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Feb 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
480
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

31W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Turks
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy