Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI FirePro V7900

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 +4658%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1280
8
TMUs
80
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Cayman
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy