Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD FirePro W4000

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000 +3148%
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy