Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon R7 265

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 150W)
AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265 +4756%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Feb 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy