Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

NVIDIA GeForce 210 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2800 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
0.039 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2 +14600%
5.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2009
Release Date
Apr 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
2816
8
TMUs
176
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

31W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Vesuvius
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy