Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs ATI FireGL V8600

NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM vs ATI FireGL V8600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 310 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (31W vs 159W)
ATI FireGL V8600 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 310 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
FireGL V8600 +877%
0.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2009
Release Date
May 2007
GeForce 300
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
333 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
5.328GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.356 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
4.712 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
44.86 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

31W
TDP
159W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
R600
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy