Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce 310M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 310M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 310M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (14W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2115MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 10.67GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 310M
0.049 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Mobile Ada Generation +26410%
12.99 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 300M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1635 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2115 MHz
667 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
10.67GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
24
16
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.424 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.5 GPixel/s
4.848 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
203.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.99 TFLOPS
48.96 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.99 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
203.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

14W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
AD107
N11M-GE1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy