Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 705A vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce 705A vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 705A and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 705A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 705A
0.091 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +13471%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 700A
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
24
48
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

950.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
3.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
91.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
7.600 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
AD107
GF119 B1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy