Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 810M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

NVIDIA GeForce 810M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce 810M and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 810M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 50W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1200MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 810M
0.73 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +236%
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Apr 2020
GeForce 800M
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

835 MHz
Base Clock
1035 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
30.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
729.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
30.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy