Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs AMD FirePro M4000

NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs AMD FirePro M4000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 825M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 825M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock941MHz
AMD FirePro M4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 825M +4%
0.723 TFLOPS
FirePro M4000
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 800M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
-
941 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
384
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.528 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
30.11 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
722.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
30.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
Chelsea
-
GPU Variant
Chelsea XT GL
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

33W
TDP
33W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy