Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 825M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 825M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 0% (941MHz vs 937MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (56.06GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 33W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 825M
0.723 TFLOPS
GeForce MX350 +65%
1.199 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 800M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
747 MHz
941 MHz
Boost Clock
937 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
384
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.528 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.99 GPixel/s
30.11 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.74 GFLOPS
722.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1199 GFLOPS
30.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
37.48 GFLOPS

Board Design

33W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy