Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM

NVIDIA GeForce 825M vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce 825M and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 825M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (1200MHz vs 941MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 825M
0.723 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 MXM +197%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Sep 2016
GeForce 800M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

850 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
941 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
896
32
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.528 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
30.11 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
722.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
30.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

33W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK208
GPU Name
Baffin
-
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
3 billion
87 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy