Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400M GS and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8400M GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2010MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3056 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8400M GS
0.026 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +47400%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 8M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-I
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
24
16
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
25.60 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

11W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
AD107
NB8M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy