Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 125W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
0.336 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +747%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2008
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 8
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.60GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
14
112
Shading Units
896
56
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
33.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
336.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

125W
TDP
80W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
TU116
G92-270-A2
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy