Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD FirePro S9100

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD FirePro S9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9100 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (12GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
2464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
FirePro S9100 +1750%
4.219 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Oct 2014
GeForce 8
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
792 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
512bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
160
20
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
80 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
Hawaii
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy