Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs ATI FirePro V9800

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 250W)
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800 +1092%
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Sep 2010
GeForce 8
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
792 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1600
24
TMUs
80
20
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
Cypress
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy