Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD Radeon HD 6970

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD Radeon HD 6970

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 2GB VRAM Radeon HD 6970 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon HD 6970 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
1440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6970 +1085%
2.703 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Dec 2010
GeForce 8
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
792 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
24
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
96
20
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
80 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.16 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
84.48 GTexel/s
-
-
-
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.703 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
675.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
Cayman
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
Cayman XT (215-0807007)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy