Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega II Duo to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 475W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega II Duo 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1720MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1020GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
4000 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo +6079%
14.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Jun 2019
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1720 MHz
792 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
320bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
1020GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
20
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
80 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.1 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
440.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.18 TFLOPS
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.09 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.045 TFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
475W
300 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
Vega 20
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 20 XT
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy