Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
5024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6900X +9557%
22.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Aug 2021
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
792 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
80
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
5120
24
TMUs
320
20
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
80 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
Navi 21
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy