Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 320GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (73.60GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
416 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 143W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM +317%
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2007
Release Date
Dec 2013
GeForce 8
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
792 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

320MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.36GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
20
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

10.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
24.62 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
-
-
228.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

143W
TDP
65W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
Cape Verde
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy