CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 640MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 's Advantages
More VRAM (640GB vs 512GB)
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (108.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
0.269 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
+346%
1.2 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
VS
Radeon HD 4870 Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Nov 2007
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 8
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
640MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
320bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
108.8GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
112
Shading Units
800
28
TMUs
40
20
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
80 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
28.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
268.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
RV770
G80-100-K0-A2
GPU Variant
RV770 XT Mac (215-0669080)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
3
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
6
AMD Radeon R9 270 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
7
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112
8
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
9
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD Radeon R9 380
10
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS Core 112 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
Related News
1
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
2
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
3
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
4
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
5
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
6
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
7
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
8
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
9
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
10
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy